翻訳と辞書 |
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. : ウィキペディア英語版 | Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
''Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.'', 263 U.S. 413 (1923), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court enunciated a rule of civil procedure that would eventually become known as the ''Rooker-Feldman'' doctrine (also named for the later case of ''District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman'', 460 U.S. 462 (1983). The doctrine holds that lower United States federal courts may not sit in direct review of state court decisions. ==Facts== The case originated in Indiana, where a judgment had been entered against the plaintiff, Rooker by an Indiana state court. The judgment was affirmed by the Indiana Supreme Court, and the plaintiff was denied review by the United States Supreme Court. The plaintiff then filed a claim in the United States district court in Indiana, seeking to overturn the judgment of the Indiana Supreme Court on constitutional grounds. The district court dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction, and the plaintiff again appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|